|
KMID : 0894520150190020111
|
|
Development & Reproduction
2015 Volume.19 No. 2 p.111 ~ p.118
|
|
|
Legislation on Genetic Diagnosis: Comparison of South Korea and Germany - With Focus on the Application and Communication Structure -
|
|
Kim Na-Kyoung
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
This article explores the questions regarding PND and PID, especially the concrete legal conditions for the justification of PND and PID. As such, the German law stipulating PND and PID in a very concrete and detailed manner is introduced and explained in comparison with the corresponding South Korean law. The South Korean Bioethics and Biosafety Act (BBA) stipulates various types of gene testing and does not demonstrate a delicate sense of each type of gene testing. In contrast to the South Korean regulation, in Germany, there exist specific regulations for genetic counseling. Especially in the case of PND, GEKO stipulates the process of genetic counseling very concretely, based on GenDG. In the case of PND and PID, it is important that the people concerned understand the meaning of testing in various angles, and restructuralize it by combining it with their own values as the diagnosis is directly combined with pregnancy/abortion, which influences the whole life of a woman (and her partner). In this context, the South Korean BBA needs to be amended as soon as possible. The sections on informed consent also need to be amended to make them more concrete. Furthermore, guidelines for concretizing the regulation of BBA need to be continuously formulated and developed.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
Genetic diagnosis, Gene testing, PND, PID, Bioethics, Bioethics and Biosafety Act, Gendiagnostikgesetz
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|